Only one week earlier than the E! Dwell from the Crimson Carpet Oscars particular, the present’s frequent host Ryan Seacrest has been accused of sexual abuse and harassment in an in depth account by a former stylist.
In a report by Selection, Seacrest’s former private stylist Suzie Hardy comes ahead with new particulars of her story and alleges that Seacrest subjected her to “years of undesirable sexual aggression,” starting from verbal harassment to slapping and groping her whereas in his underwear.
Hardy’s particular new claims come after the allegations first got here to gentle in November. Here is a have a look at the timeline of occasions.
In November 2017, THR reported that Seacrest had been accused of sexual misconduct.
Nov. 17: Information breaks former E! wardrobe stylist claimed that Seacrest was inappropriate towards her practically a decade prior whereas she labored for him. Her accusation was not publicly made, however the data grew to become obtainable as a result of Seacrest communicate out to dispute the allegations.
“Just lately, somebody that labored as a wardrobe stylist for me practically a decade in the past at E! Information, got here ahead with a grievance suggesting I behaved inappropriately towards her. If I made her really feel something however revered, I’m actually sorry. I dispute these reckless allegations and I plan to cooperate with any company inquiries that will end result,” he stated in a press release launched to The Hollywood Reporter.
“I deal with all my colleagues with kindness, dignity, and understanding, as it is a precept that is core to who I’m. All through my 25 years within the leisure trade, nearly all of my co-workers have been ladies, and I’ve endeavored to foster a optimistic work atmosphere of mutual respect and courtesy, as that is how I consider it ought to be,” he added. “I am distraught that anybody or any state of affairs would name that into query. I am pleased with my office popularity, and consider my observe file will communicate for itself. I am an advocate for ladies. I’ll proceed to help their voices.”
The E! community opened an investigation into the allegations.
Nov 17: An E! spokesperson confirmed that the community was wanting into the previous stylist’s allegations internally. “We are able to affirm that now we have began an investigation,” the consultant instructed Individuals.
In response to Selection, the investigation was carried out by an outdoor counsel employed by NBCUniversal.
RELATED: Ryan Seacrest Says the Sexual Misconduct Allegations In opposition to Him Had been “Intestine-Wrenching”
The E! investigation concluded and located “inadequate proof” to verify misconduct occurred.
Feb 1, 2018: E! launched a press release saying that the community would take no motion in opposition to Seacrest, citing “inadequate proof.”
“E! has now concluded the investigation into allegations relating to Ryan Seacrest. The investigation, carried out by exterior counsel, discovered inadequate proof to help the claims in opposition to Seacrest and subsequently couldn’t be substantiated,” the assertion stated. “E! is dedicated to offering a secure working atmosphere the place everyone seems to be handled with respect and dignity.”
Seacrest releases a column about being “wrongfully accused of harassment.”
Feb 5: Seacrest wrote concerning the accusations in an essay for The Hollywood Reporter.
“This arrived throughout an unprecedented public reckoning by ladies in our trade and past, courageously coming ahead to share their tales, lots of them heartbreaking. These ladies sought to deliver consideration to the systemic gender inequality that has occurred for many years. I used to be—and am—amazed at their bravery,” he wrote.
“To have my office conduct questioned was gut-wrenching. I’ve all the time aimed to deal with all of my colleagues with honesty, respect, kindness and compassion. But, I knew, whatever the confidence I had that there was no advantage to the allegations, my title would possible quickly seem on the lists of these suspected of despicable phrases and deeds. The pressures of our overflowing newsfeeds would insist on it.”
Seacrest went on to say he needed to be a part of the change and progress, and he obtained a discover from an “impartial third occasion” that discovered the claims in opposition to him to be unsubstantiated.
“Most of us agree that the presumption of innocence is a vital commonplace. We’re taught early on that it’s important to see all sides, to offer everybody an opportunity to clarify and to examine for exculpatory proof that will have been missed. At a time when improper interactions between women and men, significantly within the office, are a part of a nationwide dialog, we should discover a approach to make sure that everybody—the general public, personal and public establishments, accusers and alleged accused—is given the chance for a swift and honest evaluation,” he wrote.
Seacrest’s accuser Suzie Hardy goes public together with her account.
Feb 26: Just a few weeks after Seacrest wrote concerning the accusations, and one week earlier than the Oscars crimson carpet, Hardy detailed her accusations—and named herself because the accuser—to Selection.
She alleged that Seacrest subjected her to years of undesirable sexual aggression, together with groping her, slapping her, and grinding himself in opposition to her whereas solely in his underwear.
“I didn’t know easy methods to cope with it,” she stated. “I actually didn’t. I used to be battling lastly being in a good monetary place to breathe and be a mother, that I didn’t must be freaking out on a regular basis, after which coping with this childish movie star one who was testing me on each stage and manipulating me and knew that I used to be in a weak place.”
Hardy claimed that the impartial investigator by no means contacted the 4 witnesses she had referred him to who may affirm her story.
“I felt like by the third interview, it was apparent the investigator was whitewashing it for Seacrest’s facet,” she stated.
An E! spokesperson refutes Hardy’s claims.
Feb 26: “E!’s investigation was extraordinarily complete and thorough,” a rep for the community instructed Selection. “Over the course of a two-month course of, our exterior counsel interviewed greater than two dozen individuals relating to the allegations, together with a number of separate conferences with the claimant. The investigator is an legal professional with practically 20 years expertise and is very regarded professionally. Any claims that query the legitimacy of this investigation are utterly baseless.”
Seacrest’s legal professional calls the allegations “unfaithful” describes them as “false claims.”
Feb 26: Seacrest’s legal professional, Andrew Baum, instructed Selection, “It’s upsetting to us that Selection is electing to run a ‘story’ about unfaithful allegations that had been made in opposition to my consumer, after they had been instructed that the accuser threatened to make these false claims in opposition to him except he paid her $15 million. At the moment, the claimant threatened to situation a demonstrably false press assertion except she was paid. As a substitute, my consumer proactively and publicly denied the claims and agreed to totally cooperate with E!’s investigation concerning the matter.”
“On Jan. 31 the community notified us that their impartial third-party investigation had concluded that there was inadequate proof to help her claims, successfully, clearing my consumer’s title,” he continued. “It’s telling that after my consumer refused to pay her cash, and the E! investigation resulted because it did, that she is now coming ahead to share her debunked story to the press.”
Present Transcript Down
[MUSIC] [MUSIC] [MUSIC] [MUSIC] [MUSIC] [MUSIC] [MUSIC] [MUSIC]